About your Search

20121101
20121130
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)
. this thing has been opened up, and it is all on general patraeus. this is learly, no one else in the cia. he should have known better and he acted in a reckless fashion whicis why he was forceto resign. lou: my question is, it would seem to me that if a man were in his position he would understand , he is being surveiled by his own governmen. he is being -- various agencies. >> tradecraft. u: and he is being surveiled, obviously, by the bad gys. what in the word would any director think he could get away with? >> there is no insight. horrible decision making. the level of arrogance, the level of arrogance in this. you know, best for people not to be arrogant in this competitive and aggressive and conflicting world. terrible, terrible judgment on his part. lou: benghazi, cia director goes to push on interview agents. all of this obviously well after the attacks on september 11th. what in th world could you possibly be thinking? would he not be thinking of how that looks to his own agency, for him to be sitting there sifting through the papers in the dust of an attack in which someone and mos
earlier, david patraeus, head of the cia has a statement released hussein no one at the cia in any way hindered or refuse to help for those four americans were killed. and then comes a time line, and then we see a number of news outlets reported that timeline by the cia as if it were gospel. for example, david ignatius at the washington post. a veteran foreign policy correspondent suddenly embracing the cia. i have never seen the likes of this. their version, but without even qualification. >> and you know the tragedy, i kept thinking, where were we in 1972 during the watergate break-in? that was a time, and that movie is seen by every reporter as the cult classic of how reporters investigate the troops got there up against the establishment and are going to fight for the truth. what has happened that is just the opposite. we have a mainstream media that does not want to fight for the truth. it is really the press office of an obama campaign, and i think when you look back 20 years from now and people look at this era, they're not going to talk about the things you and i are talking ab
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4 (some duplicates have been removed)